<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting your Money&#8217;s Worth (ouch) on your ad buy: who&#8217;s to blame?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeronomy.com/advertising/getting-your-moneys-worth-ouch-on-your-ad-buy-whos-to-blame/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeronomy.com/advertising/getting-your-moneys-worth-ouch-on-your-ad-buy-whos-to-blame</link>
	<description>exploring the evolutionary economy of ideas, time and money</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cjmacd</title>
		<link>http://zeronomy.com/advertising/getting-your-moneys-worth-ouch-on-your-ad-buy-whos-to-blame#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>cjmacd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeronomy.com/?p=61#comment-84</guid>
		<description>my educated guess - it would have to be the traffic person at the newspaper.  &lt;br&gt;probably generated 3 different &lt;a href="http://advertising.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;advertising.com&lt;/a&gt; remnant tags - 1 for 728x90, one for 160x600 and one for 300x250.  The scheduled the 160x600 tag in the 728x90 spot, caught it quickly, corrected it.&lt;br&gt;i really doubt if it had any effect on response rate for westin or revenue for sun times.  at an average $.40 CPM paid out by &lt;a href="http://advertising.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;advertising.com&lt;/a&gt; to the newspaper, that ad would&#39;ve needed to be screwed up like this 2500 times to cost the paper $1 in revenue (not that anyone would EVER catch that). since the CTR is probably .05 %, the potential for 1 missed click isn&#39;t even worth calculating. &lt;br&gt;nobody&#39;s perfect.  I don&#39;t see the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my educated guess - it would have to be the traffic person at the newspaper.  <br />probably generated 3 different <a href="http://advertising.com" rel="nofollow">advertising.com</a> remnant tags - 1 for 728&#215;90, one for 160&#215;600 and one for 300&#215;250.  The scheduled the 160&#215;600 tag in the 728&#215;90 spot, caught it quickly, corrected it.<br />i really doubt if it had any effect on response rate for westin or revenue for sun times.  at an average $.40 CPM paid out by <a href="http://advertising.com" rel="nofollow">advertising.com</a> to the newspaper, that ad would&#39;ve needed to be screwed up like this 2500 times to cost the paper $1 in revenue (not that anyone would EVER catch that). since the CTR is probably .05 %, the potential for 1 missed click isn&#39;t even worth calculating. <br />nobody&#39;s perfect.  I don&#39;t see the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspapers Look Very Different Online &#124; CPM Advertising : CPM Advisors</title>
		<link>http://zeronomy.com/advertising/getting-your-moneys-worth-ouch-on-your-ad-buy-whos-to-blame#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspapers Look Very Different Online &#124; CPM Advertising : CPM Advisors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeronomy.com/?p=61#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] CEO happened to spot a mistrafficked ad on the Chicago Sun-Times website this past weekend when looking for information about the marathon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO happened to spot a mistrafficked ad on the Chicago Sun-Times website this past weekend when looking for information about the marathon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
